US·United States·Republican
Peter Navarro
Trump trade adviser
convicted
Former Trump White House trade adviser, convicted September 2023 of criminal contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with Jan 6 committee subpoena; served four months in federal prison.
LINKED SCANDALS
1
LEGAL EVENTS
0
RESEARCH
6 days ago
SANCTIONS
CLEAR
Deep research · Exaupdated 6 days ago
Peter Navarro, a former and current trade adviser to President Donald Trump, has faced two primary categories of legal and administrative controversy.
In 1992, during an unsuccessful mayoral campaign in San Diego, Navarro paid $4,000 in fines and court costs for violating city and state election laws.
Following his service in the first Trump administration, Navarro was indicted in June 2022 on two counts of contempt of Congress for refusing to provide documents or testimony to the House Select Committee investigating the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack. He was convicted on both counts in 2023, sentenced to four months in prison, and ordered to pay a $9,500 fine. He served his sentence in 2024. His defense, which relied on claims of executive privilege, was rejected by the courts because he failed to prove the privilege was formally invoked. Navarro has since pursued further legal action seeking to have the Justice Department explain why it reversed its position on the conviction.
Citations
Peter Navarro
en.wikipedia.org
United States v. Navarro (United States v. Navarro, 651 F.Supp.3d 212 (D. D.C. 2023)) - vLex United States
case-law.vlex.com · 2024-05-08
Navarro accuses DOJ of cop-out in decision to drop his case without explanation
www.washingtonexaminer.com · 2025-09-08
How Peter Navarro ended up in prison
thehill.com · 2024-03-19
Ex-Trump aide Peter Navarro sentenced to 4 months in prison over House Jan. 6 probe
thehill.com · 2024-01-25
JURY PETER
storage.courtlistener.com
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Peter K. Navarro stands accused of two counts of Contempt of Congress in violation of 2 U.S.C. § 192. The charges stem from his alleged refusal to produce documents and to appear for testimony in response to a subpoena issued by the now-defunct U.S. House of Representative’s Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol (“Select Committee”). Defendant moves to dismiss the charges against him. Additionally, the government moves to preclude Defendant from raising certain defenses and introducing certain exhibits at trial. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied and the government’s motion in limine is granted in part.
storage.courtlistener.com
Holding Criminal Term okUS, Ditto |
s3.documentcloud.org
Linked scandals← back
Federal filings · 8
District Court, W.D. Missouri·6:26-mj-02041·filed 2026-05-29
United States v. Navarro-Aliaga
District Court, C.D. California·2:26-cr-00227·filed 2026-04-17
United States v. Navarro
District Court, D. Arizona·2:26-mj-06087·filed 2026-04-17
United States v. Armenta-Navarro
District Court, D. Arizona·2:26-mj-06087·filed 2026-04-17
United States v. Armenta-Navarro
District Court, C.D. California·5:26-mj-00234·filed 2026-04-16
United States v. Navarro-Bernal
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana·26-30410·filed 2026-04-20
Dallas Leann Navarro
District Court, C.D. California·5:26-mj-00234·filed 2026-04-16
United States v. Navarro-Bernal
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California·2:26-bk-13744·filed 2026-04-17
Ruth Margarita Navarro